MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W877250590

A Framework for Counsellor-Cultural Broker Collaboration/Un Cadre De Collaboration Entre le Conseiller et le Médiateur Culturel

2014· article· fr· W877250590 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Novjyot Brar-Josan, Sophie Yohani

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMainstreamMental healthCultural competenceCultural diversitySociologyEthnic groupRefugeePublic relationsPsychologyPolitical sciencePedagogyAnthropologyPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

You know they say to be a counsellor it is a privilege because you get to hear people s heart and also to be a broker in that dynamic is also a privilege and an honour. (Cultural broker who works with counsellors)Cultural differences toward health, wellness, and help-seeking are among the barriers that newcomers to Canada experience when accessing mental health services (Alberta Health Services, 2008). Based on our review of the literature regarding culturally sensitive counselling, cultural brokering-the act of linking or mediating between different cultural groups (Jezewski, 1993)-is a potential solution to this service gap (Laurence et al., 2003; Raval, 2005; Singh, McKay, & Singh, 1999). A cultural broker is an individual who is well immersed in both mainstream culture and in his or her own ethnic culture (Owen & English, 2005). Paraprofessionals, settlement workers, bilingual coworkers, and diversity liaisons who are members of an ethno-cultural community are all examples of cultural brokers (Alberta Health Services, 2008; Owen & English, 2005; Raval, 2005; Yohani, 2013).Although the literature discusses the importance of cultural bridging, along with offering recommendations for collaboration with healthcare providers, there remains little knowledge as to the actual process of collaboration that occurs between cultural brokers and mental health practitioners. This article examines the recommendations that emerged from a case study examining the collaboration between cultural brokers and mental health practitioners who work with refugee youth. This particular study used Bemak and Chungs (2002) multilevel model of refugee counselling as a guiding theoretical framework to understand the process of counsellor-cultural broker collaboration. This theory provides a framework for supporting the psychological well-being of refugee youth. It should be noted that refugees represent a diverse group whose experiences are influenced by social variables such as social class, country of origin, gender, and level of education. Language proficiency, length of time in Canada, and levels of acculturation are particularly influential for immigrants and refugees with regards to accessing mainstream health services. This case study looks specifically at refugee youth who may experience barriers due to unique challenges presented by their premigratory experiences, post-settlement stressors, and cross-cultural differences.LITERATURE REVIEWRefugee youth are identified as a group who are at risk for psychological distress and yet underutilize mental health services (Bean, Eurelings-Bontekoe, Mooijaart, & Spinhoven, 2006; Fen ta, Hyman, & Noh, 2006; Nadeau & Measham, 2005). This section provides information on the barriers to navigating mainstream mental health services, the fit between mainstream mental health services and culture, and existing models and practice for refugee populations.Barriers to Navigating Mainstream Mental Health ServicesThe literature on health-seeking behaviours of migrant populations suggests a number of barriers to accessing and receiving mental health supports, such as preoccupation with meeting basic needs (Alberta Health Services, 2008; De Anstiss, Ziaian, Procter, & War land, 2009; Lustig et al., 2004) and limited health literacy related to the local healthcare system (Ingleby, 2012). In some cases, families are not registered with general practitioners, who have been found to be an important referral link to mental health services (O'Shea, Hodes, Down, & Bramley, 2000).Furthermore, when refugee youth receive counselling services, they may not understand the purpose of the services, how the intervention is supposed to work, or what the expected results are (Alberta Health Services, 2008). As is the case for most minors, refugee youth often rely on their caregivers to access mental health services for them (De Anstiss et al., 2009). This can be a barrier when parents lack knowledge of the healthcare system in a new country, along with what will happen to their children when a referral is made (Diamond, Saintonge, August, & Azrack, 2011). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0270.053
Scholarly communication0.0250.025
Open science0.0060.021
Research integrity0.0120.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Counselling and PsychotherapySame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207