MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cardiac effects of pulmonary influenza A viral infection

2008· article· en· W87783018 on OpenAlexaff
J. Alyce Bradbury, Michelle A. Carey, John M. Seubert, Page Myers, Clay Rouse, Matt Edin, Laura M. DeGraff, Dori R. Germolec, Darryl C. Zeldin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
Topicinterferon and immune responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNasal administrationCardiac function curveSalineInfluenza A virusInternal medicineTumor necrosis factor alphaPhosphorylationp38 mitogen-activated protein kinasesImmunologyEndocrinologyVirusCardiologyMAPK/ERK pathwayHeart failureBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale: Clinical studies have shown a causal relationship between influenza A viral infection (IAV) and cardiovascular disease. Methods: C57BL6 mice were infected intranasally with 200 pfu of Hong Kong influenza A (H3N2) virus while control mice received intranasal saline. Body weight and temperature were recorded daily as indicators of morbidity. On day 4, echocardiograms were performed to assess cardiac dimensions and fractional shortening. Hearts were isolated and perfused in a Langendorff mode to measure contractile function (LVDP). Cytokines and protein kinases were analyzed using Bioplex arrays. Results: IAV induced significant weight loss and changes in body temperature. Echocardiograms showed a reduction in % fractional shortening in the IAV group compared to control (p<0.05). In perfused hearts, there was an increase in post‐ischemic LVDP in IAV vs. controls (p<0.05). Serum IL‐6 levels were elevated on days 2–4, serum TNF‐αlevels were elevated on day 2, phospho‐Akt (pSer 473 ) was suppressed on day 1, and phosphorylation of p38 MAPK (pThr 180 /pTyr 182 ) was increased on day 4 in IAV group relative to controls (all p<0.05). Conclusion: We postulate that improved functional recovery may be due to a preconditioning‐like effect on the heart induced by IL‐6 and TNF‐α. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NIEHS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicinterferon and immune responsesFrench-language works237,207