Apology Politics: Transnational Features
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In September 2013, when the Finnish government appointed a commission to examine the abuse and neglect of children in out-of-home care from 1937 to 1983, the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health website noted similar studies in Sweden, Norway, Iceland, Denmark, Ireland, Wales, Scotland, the Netherlands, Australia and Canada (Socialoch hälsovårdsministeriet, 2014). Germany, Austria and Åland have also conducted investigations, while in Switzerland, the minister for justice apologized for the separation of poor or illegitimate children from their parents, although no inquiry had been carried out (Thomasson, 2013). Such transitional justice processes have much in common, despite their origin in different child welfare contexts. This chapter argues that national processes of transitional justice are linked in a global movement, allowing us to speak of an international, albeit distinctly Western, phenomenon. The Finnish reference to inquiries carried out in other countries illustrates the transnational features of this phenomenon, while pointing to the significance of international comparison in establishing such processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it