MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W88190409 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.21.5.a182-a

Mutations in Lamin A/C and their binding partners and nuclear envelope phenotype in cardiomyocytes from Dilated cardiomoyopathy patients

2007· article· en· W88190409 on OpenAlexaff
Pallavi Gupta, Zofia T. Bilińska, Nicolas Sylvius, John P. Veinot, Pierrette M. Bolongo, Émilie Boudreau, Tracy L. Jackson, Frédérique Tesson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNuclear Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalOttawa Heart InstituteUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaminMutationNuclear laminaGeneGene mutationBiologyGeneticsSomatic cellLMNAPhenotypeGermline mutationDilated cardiomyopathyMolecular biologyNuclear proteinMedicineInternal medicineHeart failureTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lamin A/C gene is one of most frequently reported mutated genes in dilated cardiomyopathy which is characterized by the dilatation of cardiac chambers and impaired contraction. Lamin A and C are major components of the nuclear lamina. From a cohort of DCM patients, we selected seven patients displaying major cardiomyocytes nucleus envelope abnormalities on electron microscopy images. In the DNA from these patients, we screened both Lamin A/C and thymopoietin genes for mutations by direct sequencing. Thymopoietin is the only lamin A/C binding partner previously shown to harbor a mutation in a DCM patient. Only one of these seven patients carried a mutation in the lamin A/C gene. No patient carried a mutation in the thymopoietin gene. In our control population of DCM patients with normal ultrastructural phenotype, two patients bore a lamin A/C gene mutation; none had a mutation in the thymopoietin gene. Taken together, our results suggest that patients with a clinical suspicion of lamin A/C mutation and with marked abnormality of cardiomyocytes nuclei might be free of both lamin A/C and thymopoietin germline mutation. These patients may therefore carry a mutation in another gene encoding a protein involved in the maintenance of the nuclear architecture or a somatic mutation. Furthermore, the occurrence of mutation in one of these genes does not necessary lead to cardiomyocyte nuclear envelope defects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicNuclear Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207