MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W88310531

REFLECTIONS: Flying the International Flag

2016· article· en· W88310531 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John B. Mannion

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransboundary Water Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternationalism (politics)DozenAttendancePolitical scienceEconomic historyLawHistoryMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In other rather industry, the North principle: poor internationalism American second disinfection, to water almost supply runs meterany a industry, internationalism runs a rather poor second to almost any other principle: disinfection, mete ing, efficient billing and collections, motherhood. You name it and international cooperation will follow it across the finish line a half hour later, whipped and near collapse. Although this phenomenon may seem to be a common national trait, in fact it no longer applies in most other branches of science and technology. Medicine, meteorology, oceanography, chemistry, astrophysics, ecdysiology are but a few of the disciplines in which international exchange is accepted as necessary and wise. Can it be that comparable gains are not to be had in the field of water supply? I am moved to this reflection by having recently attended a Congress of the International Water Supply Association (IWSA). One official told me the conference included about two dozen registrants and spouses from the United States and Canada. Malaysia was represented by 33 participants. Malaysia is about the size of New Mexico, with some 16 million inhabitants. The technical program listed 20 people from the United States and Canada as Congress contributors, only eight of whom were in attendance. Nineteen Italians were listed, along with 18 Dutch, 17 French, and 26 British, to cite just a few of the more than 50 nations represented. Delegations from these countries were, of course, much larger than the number of speakers and panelists. These comparisons are all the more telling in view of the fact that IWSA installed an American as its new president, AWWA's own past-president, Bill Richardson, of Alvord, Burdick & Howson in Chicago. Speaking on behalf of AWWA, President Steve Bonk participated in the installation ceremonies and paid tribute to Richardson for the accomplishments that won for him this honored position of international leadership. Bill will serve as IWSA president until the spring of 1991. One of Richardson's personal goals is to stimulate more extensive involvement of AWWA members in IWSA. The two organizations are complementary, not at all competitive. AWWA supports IWSA 1;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.007
Scholarly communication0.0130.016
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0170.056
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTransboundary Water Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207