Bibliographic record
Abstract
In other rather industry, the North principle: poor internationalism American second disinfection, to water almost supply runs meterany a industry, internationalism runs a rather poor second to almost any other principle: disinfection, mete ing, efficient billing and collections, motherhood. You name it and international cooperation will follow it across the finish line a half hour later, whipped and near collapse. Although this phenomenon may seem to be a common national trait, in fact it no longer applies in most other branches of science and technology. Medicine, meteorology, oceanography, chemistry, astrophysics, ecdysiology are but a few of the disciplines in which international exchange is accepted as necessary and wise. Can it be that comparable gains are not to be had in the field of water supply? I am moved to this reflection by having recently attended a Congress of the International Water Supply Association (IWSA). One official told me the conference included about two dozen registrants and spouses from the United States and Canada. Malaysia was represented by 33 participants. Malaysia is about the size of New Mexico, with some 16 million inhabitants. The technical program listed 20 people from the United States and Canada as Congress contributors, only eight of whom were in attendance. Nineteen Italians were listed, along with 18 Dutch, 17 French, and 26 British, to cite just a few of the more than 50 nations represented. Delegations from these countries were, of course, much larger than the number of speakers and panelists. These comparisons are all the more telling in view of the fact that IWSA installed an American as its new president, AWWA's own past-president, Bill Richardson, of Alvord, Burdick & Howson in Chicago. Speaking on behalf of AWWA, President Steve Bonk participated in the installation ceremonies and paid tribute to Richardson for the accomplishments that won for him this honored position of international leadership. Bill will serve as IWSA president until the spring of 1991. One of Richardson's personal goals is to stimulate more extensive involvement of AWWA members in IWSA. The two organizations are complementary, not at all competitive. AWWA supports IWSA 1;
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".