MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fatty acid composition changes in human MCF‐7 breast adenocarcinoma cells following anti‐estrogen treatments

2010· article· en· W88360436 on OpenAlexaffabout
S. St. Pierre, Marc E. Surette

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEicosapentaenoic acidArachidonic acidDocosahexaenoic acidPolyunsaturated fatty acidMCF-7Cell growthCell cultureFatty acidChemistryCancer cellMetabolismBiochemistryBiologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyCancerMedicineHuman breastEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MCF‐7 cells are an estrogen (ES) ‐dependent cell line. MCF‐7 proliferation is blocked by treatment with the anti‐ES agent 4‐OH‐tamoxifen (4‐OHT) or by incubation in ES‐depleted medium. We have previously shown that the induction or inhibition of cell proliferation in human T cells results in profound changes in cellular polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content. In this study we incubated MCF‐7 cells in ES‐depleted medium or with 4‐OHT and measured cellular fatty acids. Both treatments blocked cell proliferation but cells remained viable. A 2‐fold increase in arachidonic acid (AA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) content was measured in cells incubated with 4‐OHT compared to controls. Interestingly ES‐depleted medium lowered the cellular PUFA content. Supplementation of media with 5μM of AA or EPA increased their respective cellular content, with 4‐OHT‐treated cells attaining the highest levels. Incubations with stearidonic acid, a precursor of EPA, increased cellular EPA levels in all cells indicating the capacity for desaturation and elongation regardless of treatment. Overall, treatment of ES‐dependent MCF‐7 cells with anti‐ES treatment results in changes in PUFA metabolism. These results may be of significance given that PUFA have been implicated in cancer development and progression. (Supported by The Atlantic Innovation Fund and the Canada Research Chairs program)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207