MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W88477049

Relationship with Factors of Risk and Prevalence to High Risk Human Papillomaviruses among Malagasy Women in Fianarantsoa, Madagascar

2013· article· en· W88477049 on OpenAlexaff
J C R Rakotozafy, A Ratiarson

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Medicine and Diagnostics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Sexual intercourseTypingSexually activePrimer (cosmetics)VirologyPolymerase chain reactionGynecologyInternal medicineBiologyPopulationEnvironmental healthGeneticsGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this survey, we analyzed by means of poly merase chain reaction (PCR) cervical and b lood specimens obtained from consenting women in Fianarantsoa. Among the 1965 agreed wo men, 537 accept the two withdrawals HPV/ HIV. Different PCR techniques were used to detect HPV and HIV infection. Consensus primer sets MY and GP were utilized to obtain HPV typing. For HIV, SK was utilized. The result showed that 89 specimens are positive by M Y and GP. For HIV test , all showed negative. From the wo man infected by HPV, they all have took tobacco at least 6 times a day, age of the first sexual intercourse 14 years, 8 partners at least and they also have sexually transmitted infections antecedents. Keyswords Hu man Papillo mav irus es (HPV), Madagascar, Sexually Transmitted In fections (STIs), Po ly merase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Medicine and Diagnostics→Same topicCervical Cancer and HPV Research→French-language works237,207→