MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 9642: Non-Invasive Magnetic Resonance Based Three-Dimensional Voltage Maps for Electrophysiology Procedure Guidance

2011· article· en· W88705721 on OpenAlexaff
Takeshi Sasaki, Christopher F. Miller, Rozann Hansford, Menekhem M. Zviman, Charles A. Henrikson, Joseph E. Marine, David Spragg, Alan Cheng, Harikrishna Tandri, Sunil K. Sinha, Aravindan Kolandaivelu, Gordon F. Tomaselli, Ronald D. Berger, Hugh Calkins, David A. Bluemke, Saman Nazarian

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWelding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Canadian institutionsBerger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineElectrophysiologyMagnetic resonance imagingNuclear magnetic resonanceInternal medicineRadiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The association of scar on late-gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) with electrograms on electroanatomic map (EAM) has been investigated. We sought to quantify these associations to enable the creation of non-invasive three dimensional voltage maps (3D-VMs) based on LGE-CMR. We then tested the accuracy of the non-invasive 3D-VMs. Methods: LGE-CMR was performed in 17 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy before ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. Left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT) and scar thickness (ST) were measured in each of 20 sectors per LGE-CMR short axis plane. In the first series of 13 patients (training set), EAM points were registered to the corresponding LGE-CMR images. Multivariate linear regression analysis (MLRA) was performed to determine significant independent variables and coefficients that predict local bipolar voltage. In the remaining patients (test set), non-invasive 3D-VMs were prospectively created with the regression equations by MLRA. Invasive local bipolar voltages were then compared with the estimated bipolar voltage based on non-invasive 3D-VMs. Results: A total of 1293 EAM points were analyzed. MLRA revealed independent associations between local bipolar voltage and LVWT, ST and scar location (P<0.001, respectively). Prospective non-invasive 3D-VMs were then created with custom software. There was no significant difference in mean bipolar voltage on EAMs and non-invasive 3D-VMs created for the test set (1.7±1.2 vs. 1.6±1.7 mV,P=0.17). Linear regression analysis revealed a significant association between bipolar voltages on invasive EAM and noninvasive 3D-VMs (P<0.001, R=0.79). Conclusions: The independent associations of local bipolar voltage with LVWT, ST on LGE-CMR enable the creation of accurate non-invasive 3D-VMs based on LGE-CMR. This novel methodology may improve the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation in patients with ischemic scar-related VT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicWelding Techniques and Residual StressesFrench-language works237,207