MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W89347763

Real-Time Freeway Travel Time Prediction Using Vehicle Trajectory Data

2011· article· en· W89347763 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pedram Izadpanah, Bruce Hellinga, Liping Fu

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Board 90th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrajectoryGlobal Positioning SystemFloating car dataReal-time dataComputer scienceTraffic flow (computer networking)Real-time computingAutomatic vehicle locationSection (typography)Travel timeTransport engineeringSimulationEngineeringTraffic congestionTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a new methodology proposed for real-time travel time prediction utilizing vehicle trajectory data and shockwave information. The main idea behind this methodology is that average speed on a section of roadway is constant unless a shockwave is created due to change in flow or traffic density. In the proposed methodology first the route is discretized into a number of smaller road sections and the average speed of each section is calculated based on the available information obtained from vehicles trajectories during the current time interval. The travel times obtained from average speed of each road section are modified if any shockwaves are identified in the traffic stream. The proposed model was evaluated using the vehicle trajectory data from global positioning system (GPS) data loggers on a freeway section in Toronto, Ontario. It is shown that the prediction accuracy of the proposed model is superior to the travel times obtained from traditional loop detectors. Moreover, this paper shows that alternative sources of data which use the existing infrastructure (e.g. cell phone network) can potentially be used to acquire traffic information. This is especially important for rural freeways which do not have full Freeway Traffic Management System (FTMS) infrastructure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Board 90th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207