Dieta y ejercicio físico. Binomio saludable
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El estado de salud de una persona es la resultante de la combinacion de distintos factores, dotacion genetica, edad, situacion nutricional, actividad fisica, asi como factores medioambientales, higiene, salubridad, estres, tabaco.(1,2) La existencia de malos habitos de alimentacion y de otros factores de riesgo, conduce a un aumento en el riesgo de desarrollar enfermedades cronicas, obesidad, diabetes, enfermedad cardiovascular, osteoporosis y determinado tipo de cancer. Enfermedades que vienen ocupando las mayores tasas de morbilidad y mortalidad en los paises europeos. Esta situacion parece justificar que en nuestro pais se esta produciendo una defectuosa intervencion sobre distintos factores de riesgo, o quizas un empeoramiento en el control de algunos de ellos, donde la dieta y el estilo de vida parecen claramente implicados. Parece claro que si tomamos como base los determinantes angulares para la salud cardiovascular identificados en la Declaracion de Victoria sobre Salud Cardiaca (Canada. 1992), habitos de alimentacion saludables, estilo de vida exento de tabaco, actividad fisica regular y ambiente psicosocial favorable, las perspectivas en un futuro proximo en nuestro pais no parecen muy favorables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".