MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W89532499 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.20.4.a330-d

Modulation of ion channels by protons in retinal horizontal cells

2006· article· en· W89532499 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael G. Jonz, Steven Barnes

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNova Scotia Health Research Foundation
KeywordsBiophysicsExtracellularRetinaChemistryIon channelInward-rectifier potassium ion channelPatch clampNeurotransmissionReversal potentialConductanceNeuroscienceBiologyBiochemistryReceptorPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protons are synaptic modulators acting between photoreceptors and horizontal cells in the retina. We investigated the effects of H + in modulating or carrying ion channel current in horizontal cells of the goldfish retina with patch‐clamp. In voltage‐clamp experiments, increasing the concentration of extracellular H + (pH o = 7.8–6.0) produced reversible inhibition of inward rectifier K + (I Kir ) and Ca 2+ (I Ca ) currents and, in the absence of extracellular calcium (Ca 2+ o ), a prominent inhibition of outward current. However, in the presence of K + channel blockers (20 mM TEA, 10 mM 4‐AP), H + increased an inward conductance at hyperpolarized potentials (‐100 mV). Characteristics of this current were similar to those of I Kir , such as reversal near the K + equilibrium potential and inhibition by 100 μM glutamate and 10 mM Cs + . Therefore, this increase in current by H + may have been due to activation of I Kir or reduced block of Kir channels by TEA and 4‐AP. In the physiological range between −70 mV and −20 mV, increasing extracellular H + also induced inward current that reversed positive to E H and that was dependent on the presence of Ca 2+ o . This H + ‐activated current may represent a population of non‐selective cation channels permeable to H + . These data demonstrate multiple targets for H + ‐modulation of ion channels in horizontal cells and suggest potential mechanisms through which H + could modulate synaptic transmission in the retina. Supported by NSHRF and CIHR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research→French-language works237,207→