MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W896809431

A State’s Right to Military Power: The International Legal Implications of Potential SDF Action

2013· article· en· W896809431 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rachel Mueller

Bibliographic record

VenueDuke journal of comparative & international law · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary and Defense Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstitutionLawState (computer science)Guard (computer science)Use of forcePolitical scienceRules of engagementPower (physics)International lawProportionality (law)MathematicsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10/the-21st-century-militia-state-defense-forces-and-homeland-security. 7.In an attempt to avoid confusion in discussion of sovereign nations as opposed to the fifty states of the United states, for the purposes of this Note, the word "state" refers to one of the fifty states of the United States.The word "nation" refers to any sovereign body.Any quotes have bracketed changed language to reflect this convention and, hopefully, avoid confusion.8. Mexican drug violence occurring at and near the United States border makes the possibility of altercation with Mexican citizens, police, or soldiers much more likely than any engagement with Canada at the United States-Canada border.See

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDuke journal of comparative & international lawSame topicMilitary and Defense StudiesFrench-language works237,207