MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W897471759

HIV and Shared Responsibility: A Critical Evaluation of Mabior and DC

2013· article· en· W897471759 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kevin Rawluk

Bibliographic record

VenueDalhousie journal of legal studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCriminalizationAutonomyHarmObligationLawCriminal lawSupreme courtSexual assaultPolitical scienceCriminologyConfidentialityHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)SociologyPoison controlSuicide preventionMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper challenges the way that the Supreme Court of Canada currently thinks about HIV non-disclosure. A one-sided disclosure obligation that is tied to the risk of harm reflects a shallow autonomy, bring the criminal law in line with important public health initiatives, and help combat the stigma surrounding HIV/AIDS. understanding of autonomy, consent, and the policy underlying the criminalization of sexual assault. The criminal law should recognize joint obligations to ask about and to disclose HIV status. These joint obligations promote a realistic and empowering view of sexual

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalhousie journal of legal studiesSame topicCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisFrench-language works237,207