MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W89751757 · doi:10.1093/pch/8.10.613

Metapneumovirus and its place in childhood

2003· article· en· W89751757 on OpenAlexaff
Rolando Ulloa‐Gutiérrez

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchiolitisrhinorrheaTachypneaMedicineHuman metapneumovirusEtiologyPediatricsPneumoniaMetapneumovirusRespiratory tract infectionsEpidemiologyVirusImmunologyIntensive care medicineRespiratory systemInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human metapneumovirus (hMPV) was recently identified as a cause of acute upper and lower respiratory tract infection in children and adults. The epidemiology is similar to that exhibited by respiratory syncytial virus, with most episodes occurring during the winter months. The virus likely has a worldwide distribution. Almost all children have been infected by five years of age. The suspicion of hMPV infection should be higher in infants or children presenting with symptoms compatible with a viral etiology and in whom screening tests for other common viral pathogens have been negative. Clinical manifestations may be subtle or severe, including life-threatening bronchiolitis or pneumonia. Fever, rhinorrhea, cough, retractions, tachypnea and wheezing are common findings. Bronchiolitis is perhaps the most common manifestation among hospitalized children. Currently, there is no antiviral treatment or vaccine available and management is simply supportive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicRespiratory viral infections research→French-language works237,207→