MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W89785476 · doi:10.2310/6620.2008.08022

Nickel Sensitization, Hand Eczema, and Loss-of-Function Mutations in the Filaggrin Gene

2008· article· en· W89785476 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jacob P. Thyssen, Berit Christina Carlsen, Torkil Menné

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatitis · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFilaggrinSensitizationNickel allergyMedicineAtopic dermatitisDermatologyNickelImmunologyDiseaseLoss functionGeneGeneticsAllergyContact dermatitisBiologyPathologyChemistryPhenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease. Recently, it was demonstrated that a large proportion of individuals with AD have an epidermal expression deficiency of filaggrin (FLG). This unique finding may have great implications for our understanding of nickel sensitization because nickel is chelated in the epidermis and perhaps to FLG. This review aims to briefly present the current knowledge about nickel sensitization in relation to FLG deficiency and speculate on its possible implications. The new knowledge concerning loss-of-function mutations in the FLG gene (the lack of specific nickel-chelating power in the stratum corneum and a generally defective skin barrier) suggests that an additive effect from irritants and nickel may aggravate hand eczema in individuals with loss-of-function mutations in the FLG gene. This hypothesis calls for a reevaluation of the potential risk of nickel sensitization through the establishment of cohorts with and without such mutations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatitisSame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207