Forms of development and tourism strategy for natural sporting locations.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les loisirs sportifs de nature et l’activité socio-économique qu’ils engendrent représentent des enjeux certains pour les espaces de nature qui se positionnent comme territoires touristiques. Ils sont constitués de stations sportives, de centres de loisir et de parcours touristiques divers qu’on valorise parfois en édifiant des parcs régionaux. Comment sont pensés la gestion et les aménagements récréatifs de ces espaces ? L’action de développement des acteurs du tourisme de plein air se réfère-t-elle exclusivement au management classique ou repose-t-elle sur des modèles culturels et des éthiques divergents, voire opposés ? Ce travail en articulant des approches théoriques et empiriques vise à montrer que le fonctionnement des espaces touristiques met en présence une pluralité de modèles de management et de logiques d’action spécifiques aux catégories d’acteurs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".