MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W89986709

Salt-tracer experiments to measure hyporheic transit time distributions in gravel-bed sediments

2009· article· en· W89986709 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marcel van der Perk, Ellen L. Petticrew, Philip N. Owens, Robert B. Hulsman, L. Wubben

Bibliographic record

VenueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlumeTRACERHydrology (agriculture)InletGeologyGroundwaterPiezometerEnvironmental scienceHyporheic zoneSoil scienceFlow (mathematics)Geotechnical engineeringGeomorphologyAquiferMechanics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We performed a series of tracer experiments in large outdoor flumes at the Quesnel River Research Centre, Likely, BC, Canada to quantify the hyporheic transit time distribution in gravel bed sediments. For this purpose, an 18.9 m x 2 m flume was filled with a 30 cm thick layer of well-sorted gravel with a d50 of 39.1 mm. The average longitudinal gradient of the gravel bed was 0.05% The flumes were filled with aerated local groundwater, so that a standing water layer of 20 cm depth over the gravel bed was established. Subsequently, dissolved common salt until the water reached an electrical conductivity (EC) between 450 and 550 µS/cm. The flumes were equilibrated overnight to ensure a uniform distribution of the salt concentration across the flume. At the start of each experiment local groundwater (EC = 150µS/cm) was discharged at a rate of approximately 16 l/s at the upper end of the flume. At 10 m downstream from the inlet the EC was monitored in the water layer until the EC remained constant at a value close to the background value of about 150 µS/cm. The experiment was replicated three times. The measured breakthrough curves were used to calculate the overall transit time distributions of water in the 10 m stretch of the flume. The transit time distribution in the water layer was calculated using the longitudinal dispersion coefficient estimated using the empirical equation of Fischer et al. (1979). For the transit time distributions within the gravel layer we assumed a probability density function as proposed by Marion and Zaramella (2005). These hyporheic transit time distributions were estimated using least-squares deconvolution of the overall transit time distributions. The fitted overall transit time distributions corresponded fairly well to the‘observed' distributions. The 10th percentile of the hyporheic transit time distributions in the 10 m stretch of the flume varied between 45 s and 65 s. The median transit time ranged between 200 s and 295 s and the 90th percentile between 790 s and 1435 s. References Fischer, H.B., E.J. List, R.C.Y. Koh, J. Imberger, and N.H. Brooks 1979.Mixing in Inland and Coastal Waters. New York: Academic Press. Marion,A., and M. Zaramella 2005. A residence time model for stream-subsurface exchange of contaminants. Acta Geophysica Polonica 53: 525-538.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)→Same topicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics→French-language works237,207→