MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W90406732

El daño moral en el sistema de responsabilidad por el transporte aéreo internacional: un enfoque moderno para nuevas necesidades

2009· article· es· W90406732 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Norberto Ezequiel Luongo

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de derecho del transporte: Terrestre, marítimo, aéreo y multimodal · 2009
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative International Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente articulo esta dedicado al tema del resarcimiento por dano moral en el caso del transporte aereo de pasajeros, presentando los grandes casos jurisprudenciales que tuvieron a su cargo la explicitacion y delimitacion de los conceptos de accidente y lesion corporal, y en particular se analiza la extension de este ultimo y su relacion con la cuestion de la procedencia de indemnizacion por dano moral dentro el ambito del Sistema de Varsovia y del Convenio de Montreal de 1999. A continuacion, se comentan los decisorios que bucearon en la problematica planteada acerca del caracter de exclusividad que tales instrumentos revisten, y se expone la teoria de que la mas reciente jurisprudencia, en su afan de ejercer un rol tuitivo y protector de los derechos de usuario-pasajero, ha expandido los conceptos antes mencionados, a expensas de un retroceso en la interpretacion del sistema de responsabilidad por el transporte aereo internacional como causa de accion exclusiva para dar mas preponderancia a la anterior nocion de remedio exclusivo. A tal fin, y a modo de ejemplo, se propone el estudio en detalle de una linea jurisprudencial concreta, cual es la elaborada recientemente en la Republica Argentina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.052
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de derecho del transporte: Terrestre, marítimo, aéreo y multimodalSame topicComparative International Legal StudiesFrench-language works237,207