MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W90435404 · doi:10.7202/010152ar

Préférence des femmes canadiennes et québécoises non enceintes quant au sexe du premier enfant

2004· article· fr· W90435404 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jacques D. Marleau, Jean‐François Saucier

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers québécois de démographie · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceGynecologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Toutes les recherches américaines concernant la préférence des femmes non enceintes révèlent qu'elles désirent un garçon comme premier enfant. Au Canada, nous avons déterminé la préférence des femmes non enceintes à l'aide de données de l'Enquête sur la fécondité (1984). Les femmes préfèrent un enfant de sexe masculin comme premier enfant (22 %, contre 16% pour une fille). Cependant, 62 % des répondantes déclarent n'avoir aucune préférence. Certaines différences apparaissent selon le lieu de résidence : les Québécoises expriment une légère inclination à l'égard d'une fille, tandis que les femmes des autres provinces canadiennes désirent un garçon. Il est intéressant de constater que près de la moitié des femmes ayant déjà un enfant — peu importe leur lieu de résidence — souhaitent avoir un second enfant de sexe opposé à celui du premier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers québécois de démographieSame topicDemographic Trends and Gender PreferencesFrench-language works237,207