MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W90494287

[Fingolimod in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Novelties presented at the annual congress of the American Academy of Neurology (Toronto, April 2010)].

2010· other· en· W90494287 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
X Rabasseda

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFingolimodMedicineTolerabilityMultiple sclerosisNeurologyAdverse effectDrugAlternative medicineOncologyPharmacologyPsychiatryPathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fingolimod, a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator, is currently on registration as an oral treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the European Union and United States of America. New and important information on the drug was presented during the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology held in Toronto in April 2010, including, notably, results from the TRANSFORMS and FREEDOMS studies that, besides confirming the therapeutic benefit of the drug as a first-line therapy for multiple sclerosis, with superiority over interferon beta1a on clinical, inflammatory and functional outcomes, confirmed the safety and tolerability of the agent and described a specific benefit on the patients' functional abilities performing daily tasks. With additional new information on safety and tolerability and some new insight into the mechanism of action of fingolimod, new information presented during the meeting further supported the role of the drug in the treatment of multiple sclerosis and renewed hope for treating patients with a new therapeutic tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies→French-language works237,207→