MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W90521005 · doi:10.15581/001.15.1715

Trayectoria biográfica de Joaquín Marcos Satrustegui Bris (Donostia-San Sebastián 1817-1885), mediador en el convenio de Bergara, diplomático y contrario a la abolición foral de 1876

2012· article· es· W90521005 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joseba Agirreazkuenaga Zigorraga

Bibliographic record

VenueMemoria y Civilización · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBasque language and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exiliado en Inglaterra, miliciano liberal en San Sebastián, agregado al cuartel general del comandante de la Legión Británica, intérprete de la delegación británica durante la primera guerra carlista y agente durante las negociaciones del Tratado de Bergara que puso fin a la guerra en el País Vasco. Partidario de Constitución Foral vasca. Comerciante y socio de la firma E. Mickle and Company (1850) en San Francisco (California). Fue nombrado consul de España en San Francisco el 2/6/1851 y posteriormente consul de Parma en el Estado de California (1853). Desde 1864 pasó a ser diplomático de carrera, sirviendo como consul de España en Newcastle, Argelia, Montreal, Nueva York y Londres. Recibió el título del reino de Barón de Satrústegui en 1876. J.M. Satrústegui era, además, otro arquetipo del emigrante vasco:tenía una sólida preparación profesional, participó en diferentes empresas y se convirtió en funcionario de la estructura burocrática del estado- nación español, siguiendo la senda del grupo de presión liberal de San Sebastián. Socio fundador de la compañía naviera Lopez y Cia (1857).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemoria y CivilizaciónSame topicBasque language and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207