Bibliographic record
Abstract
# Remission is important outcome {#article-title-2} EDITOR—The authors of either of the two large trials of St John's wort for treating depression published in the BMJ have reported the proportion of patients entering full remission of symptoms after acute treatment. 1 2 This is unfortunate as remission of symptoms rather than response to treatment should be the key outcome objective. Partial remission is a common adverse outcome of depression after short term treatment and carries with it a high risk of relapse and continuing disability.3 There is now emerging evidence that although all antidepressants seem to be similarly efficacious in producing a short term response, there are differences in remission rates, particularly in severely ill patients.4 This shows the importance of reporting categorical as well as continuous outcomes in clinical trials of treatment with antidepressants. 1. 1.↵1. Woelk H, for the Remotiv/Imipramine Study Group .Comparison of St John's wort and imipramine for treating depression: randomized controlled trial.BMJ2000; 321:536–539. (2 September.) [OpenUrl][1][Abstract/FREE Full Text][2] 2. 2.↵1. Philipp M, 2. Kohnen R, 3. Hiller KO .Hypericum extract versus imipramine or placebo in patients with moderate depression: randomised multi-centre study of treatment for eight weeks.BMJ1999; 319:1534–1538. [OpenUrl][3][Abstract/FREE Full Text][4] 3. 3.↵1. Cornwall PL, 2. Scott J .Partial remission in depressive disorders.Acta Psychiatr Scand1997; 95:265–271. [OpenUrl][5][PubMed][6][Web of Science][7] 4. 4.↵1. Kent JM .SNaRIs, NaSSAs, and NaRIs: new agents for the treatment of depression.Lancet2000; 355:911–918. [OpenUrl][8][CrossRef][9][PubMed][10][Web of Science][11] # Study design casts doubt on value of St John's wort in treating depression {#article-title-7} EDITOR—Although it is impressive to see a study in which hypericum is equivalent to an antidepressant, suggesting efficacy, the design of this study by Woelk et al makes it difficult for us to know the value of St John's wort for the treatment of depression.1 Firstly, imipramine is an outdated antidepressant. The current batch of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and atypical antidepressants have far fewer side effects and can be tailored to the specific needs and responses of the patient. Will hypericum be coupled with activating herbs (such as Gingko biloba or Siberian ginseng) or sedating ones (such as kava or valerian root) to achieve the same effect? This study strikes me as an example of statistical interest (yes, hypericum may be at least as effective as imipramine), but it has minimal practical clinical relevance. Secondly, the study ran for only six weeks. Most studies exploring the efficacy of an antidepressant run for a … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DBMJ%26rft.stitle%253DBMJ%26rft.issn%253D0007-1447%26rft.aulast%253DWoelk%26rft.auinit1%253DH.%26rft.volume%253D321%26rft.issue%253D7260%26rft.spage%253D536%26rft.epage%253D539%26rft.atitle%253DComparison%2Bof%2BSt%2BJohn%2527s%2Bwort%2Band%2Bimipramine%2Bfor%2Btreating%2Bdepression%253A%2Brandomised%2Bcontrolled%2Btrial%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1136%252Fbmj.321.7260.536%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F10968813%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=bmj&resid=321/7260/536&atom=%2Fbmj%2F322%2F7284%2F493.atom [3]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DBMJ%26rft.stitle%253DBMJ%26rft.issn%253D0007-1447%26rft.aulast%253DPhilipp%26rft.auinit1%253DM.%26rft.volume%253D319%26rft.issue%253D7224%26rft.spage%253D1534%26rft.epage%253D1539%26rft.atitle%253DHypericum%2Bextract%2Bversus%2Bimipramine%2Bor%2Bplacebo%2Bin%2Bpatients%2Bwith%2Bmoderate%2Bdepression%253A%2Brandomised%2Bmulticentre%2Bstudy%2Bof%2Btreatment%2Bfor%2Beight%2Bweeks%2B%2595%2BCommentary%253A%2BHas%2Bhypericum%2Bfound%2Bits%2Bplace%2Bin%2Bantidepressant%2Btreatment%253F%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F10591711%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [4]: /lookup/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=bmj&resid=319/7224/1534&atom=%2Fbmj%2F322%2F7284%2F493.atom [5]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DActa%2Bpsychiatrica%2BScandinavica%26rft.stitle%253DActa%2BPsychiatr%2BScand%26rft.aulast%253DCornwall%26rft.auinit1%253DP.%2BL.%26rft.volume%253D95%26rft.issue%253D4%26rft.spage%253D265%26rft.epage%253D271%26rft.atitle%253DPartial%2Bremission%2Bin%2Bdepressive%2Bdisorders.%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F9150818%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [6]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=9150818&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fbmj%2F322%2F7284%2F493.atom [7]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1997WX14700001&link_type=ISI [8]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DLancet%26rft.stitle%253DLancet%26rft.aulast%253DKent%26rft.auinit1%253DJ.%2BM.%26rft.volume%253D355%26rft.issue%253D9207%26rft.spage%253D911%26rft.epage%253D918%26rft.atitle%253DSNaRIs%252C%2BNaSSAs%252C%2Band%2BNaRIs%253A%2Bnew%2Bagents%2Bfor%2Bthe%2Btreatment%2Bof%2Bdepression.%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1016%252FS0140-6736%252899%252911381-3%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F10752718%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [9]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(99)11381-3&link_type=DOI [10]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10752718&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fbmj%2F322%2F7284%2F493.atom [11]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000085896000041&link_type=ISI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".