MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Phosphatidylinositol 4‐phosphate dynamics during phagocytosis

2015· article· en· W909314145 on OpenAlexaff
Roni Levin, Gerald Hammond, Tamás Balla, Gregory D. Fairn, Sergio Grinstein

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Research and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhagocytosisPhagosomePhosphatidylinositolCell biologyChemistryBiologyBiochemistrySignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phosphoinositide levels undergo acute changes during the course of phagocytosis; phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐ bis phosphate [PtdIns(4,5)P 2 ], phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5‐ tris phosphate and phosphatidylinositol 3‐phosphate (PtdIns3P) undergo marked changes. However, the fate of phosphatidylinositol 4‐phosphate (PtdIns4P) has not been investigated. Recently, a genetically encoded biosensor was developed to visualize PtdIns4P in live cells. The probe, called P4M2x, consists of two copies of the PtdIns4P‐binding domain of SidM, a Legionella pneumophila effector , tagged with a fluorescent protein. Expression of P4M2x in macrophages revealed tri‐phasic changes of PtdIns4P during phagocytosis. PtdIns4P, normally present in the plasma membrane, underwent a transient, moderate increase as the phagosome sealed, coinciding with the disappearance of PtdIns(4,5)P 2 . This initial increase was followed by the virtual disappearance of PtdIns4P, which coincided with accumulation of PtdIns3P. At the time when PtdIns3P disappeared, a gradual reacquisition of PtdIns4P was observed, exceeding the levels normally found at the plasma membrane. This reappearance of PtdIns4P was preceded by the sequential acquisition of Rab5 followed by Rab7 –early and late maturation indicators, respectively. The reacquisition of PtdIns4P was accompanied by the appearance of P4M2x‐positive tubules that extended dynamically between phagosomes and the pericentriolar Golgi area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicBiomedical Research and PathophysiologyFrench-language works237,207