MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W91240268 · doi:10.5006/c2003-03333

Effect of Rotating Cage Geometry on Flow Pattern and Corrosion Rate

2003· article· en· W91240268 on OpenAlexaff
Sankara Papavinasam, Alex Doiron, R. Winston Revie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat transfer and supercritical fluids
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCageCorrosionMaterials scienceFlow (mathematics)GeometryVolumetric flow rateMechanicsComposite materialStructural engineeringPhysicsEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A brief history of the development of the rotating cage as a promising and reliable laboratory methodology for inhibitor evaluation is presented. The influence of the geometry of the rotating cage on the flow pattern as well as on corrosion rates has been investigated. The importance of vessel length and diameter, rotating cage length (and, as a consequence, the sample length), rotating cage diameter, rotation speed, volume of liquid, and flow pattern in determining the corrosion rates, and hence, inhibitor efficiency has been established.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat transfer and supercritical fluidsFrench-language works237,207