MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W912638944

抑制性差减杂交(SSH)技术在分离植物差异表达基因中的应用

2006· article· zh· W912638944 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
黄鑫, 戴思兰, 孟丽, 郑国生

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2006
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

抑制性差减杂交技术(SSH)是基于抑制PCR作用的cDNA差减杂交,是在转录水平上研究差异基因表达的技术。该技术在一个循环过程中完成差异表达基因丰度的均等化及目标群体和对照群体中相同基因的去除,从而实现差异表达基因的高度富集。一个典型的SSH过程,可在一个差减杂交过程中将稀有基因序列富集上千倍。本文通过详细分析该技术在植物差异表达基因分离中的应用发现:SSH技术主要用于分离组织特异性表达和诱导型表达的基因。首先,SSH技术广泛应用在分离植物发育过程中不同发育阶段和不同组织器官中的组织特异性表达的基因,为揭示植物生长发育过程的分子机理提供了有效手段;另外,在不同植物中,该技术被大量应用于分离各种生物及非生物胁迫条件下诱导表达的抗性相关基因,可以揭示植物抗逆的分子机理。目前,SSH技术己开始应用于分离与次生代谢产物合成相关的基因。SSH技术是分离植物差异表达基因,揭示植物复杂生命现象分子机理的有效方法,将在植物差异表达基因研究中得到更广泛的应用。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207