Decline of Democracy in East-Central Europe: The Last Decade as the Lost Decade in Democratization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The last decade of the EU membership has been a lost decade East-Central Europe many ways, first of all for the young generation, which has become a lost generation to a great extent, but also for the new twin paradigm of EU as the performance democracy and the sustainable social progress. The Ten Years' Anniversary of the EU membership gives a good occasion to analyse and evaluate the performance of ECE the EU. However, it does not give too much reason for the celebration, since it has been very controversial the terms of economic, social and political developments. This period has to be discussed the larger framework of systemic change (the Quarter-Century perspective), but with special regard to the EU membership period (the Ten Years perspective). This paper conceptually follows my recent paper (Agh 2014), dealing with the general framework on NMS developments both the Quarter-Century and Ten Years perspectives. This new paper concentrates, however, on the socio-political aspect of the Europeanization and Democratization East-Central Europe (V4+ as Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia and Croatia). The contributors to the Bertelsmann country reports (BTI, Bertelsmann Transformation Index and SGI, Sustainable Governance Indicators) have discussed the topic of ECE democratization with its general-regional and nation-specific features within the CEPSA (Central European Political Science Association) several times. Moreover, the big international ranking institutions like the Economist Intelligence Unit and the Freedom House (and many others) have also evaluated and documented these democratic developments. They have also concluded that the ECE democracy has been decline, especially the last years. Thus, this analysis of Europeanization and Democratization ECE can be based on the large documentation of these databases, and also on the cooperation of the ECE experts within the CEPSA and elsewhere.Key words: East-Central Europe; triple crisis; decline of democracy; good governance; global competitiveness.i Successes and failures of the ece countries the eu1.1 The European landscape and the forgotten the EastThe EU 2004, at the accession of the ECE countries, was rather different from the EU 2014, when they commemorate their Ten Years' membership. Therefore a short overview as an introduction is needed about both the new European landscape general and the forgotten the East particular, to be completed the last part of this paper with the larger overview of the present situation ECE. The EU has gone through several development stages that have necessitated its permanent redefinition. Under the pressure of global it has become common sense that the EU is or even some extreme views, its final crisis. Thus, the word has been so inflated that there is now a fashionable saying: crisis is just a period between two other crises. In fact, the EU has always been crisis, it comes from its sui generis nature of being always in the making, therefore the EU needs the analytical-descriptive and the normative-strategic approaches at the same time. There have recently been obviously three markedly different periods of crisis: (1) the immobility the nineties and early 2000s, (2) the global the late 2000s and early 2010s and (3) the the mid-2010s. In this respect, the crises are the natural ways of development for the EU, especially the present transformation which demands new solutions for both institutions and policies. Therefore, the EU needs visions for further development and these visions have to be formulated the concrete terms and programs of Strategies like the EU2020 Strategy.2In the transformation period the EU28 has become more than a MultiSpeed Europe, it is already a Multi-Floor Europe, since the different member states' positions have become institutionalized, i. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it