Decline of Democracy in East-Central Europe: The Last Decade as the Lost Decade in Democratization
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The last decade of the EU membership has been a lost decade East-Central Europe many ways, first of all for the young generation, which has become a lost generation to a great extent, but also for the new twin paradigm of EU as the performance democracy and the sustainable social progress. The Ten Years' Anniversary of the EU membership gives a good occasion to analyse and evaluate the performance of ECE the EU. However, it does not give too much reason for the celebration, since it has been very controversial the terms of economic, social and political developments. This period has to be discussed the larger framework of systemic change (the Quarter-Century perspective), but with special regard to the EU membership period (the Ten Years perspective). This paper conceptually follows my recent paper (Agh 2014), dealing with the general framework on NMS developments both the Quarter-Century and Ten Years perspectives. This new paper concentrates, however, on the socio-political aspect of the Europeanization and Democratization East-Central Europe (V4+ as Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia and Croatia). The contributors to the Bertelsmann country reports (BTI, Bertelsmann Transformation Index and SGI, Sustainable Governance Indicators) have discussed the topic of ECE democratization with its general-regional and nation-specific features within the CEPSA (Central European Political Science Association) several times. Moreover, the big international ranking institutions like the Economist Intelligence Unit and the Freedom House (and many others) have also evaluated and documented these democratic developments. They have also concluded that the ECE democracy has been decline, especially the last years. Thus, this analysis of Europeanization and Democratization ECE can be based on the large documentation of these databases, and also on the cooperation of the ECE experts within the CEPSA and elsewhere.Key words: East-Central Europe; triple crisis; decline of democracy; good governance; global competitiveness.i Successes and failures of the ece countries the eu1.1 The European landscape and the forgotten the EastThe EU 2004, at the accession of the ECE countries, was rather different from the EU 2014, when they commemorate their Ten Years' membership. Therefore a short overview as an introduction is needed about both the new European landscape general and the forgotten the East particular, to be completed the last part of this paper with the larger overview of the present situation ECE. The EU has gone through several development stages that have necessitated its permanent redefinition. Under the pressure of global it has become common sense that the EU is or even some extreme views, its final crisis. Thus, the word has been so inflated that there is now a fashionable saying: crisis is just a period between two other crises. In fact, the EU has always been crisis, it comes from its sui generis nature of being always in the making, therefore the EU needs the analytical-descriptive and the normative-strategic approaches at the same time. There have recently been obviously three markedly different periods of crisis: (1) the immobility the nineties and early 2000s, (2) the global the late 2000s and early 2010s and (3) the the mid-2010s. In this respect, the crises are the natural ways of development for the EU, especially the present transformation which demands new solutions for both institutions and policies. Therefore, the EU needs visions for further development and these visions have to be formulated the concrete terms and programs of Strategies like the EU2020 Strategy.2In the transformation period the EU28 has become more than a MultiSpeed Europe, it is already a Multi-Floor Europe, since the different member states' positions have become institutionalized, i. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle