MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W915179398

Decline of Democracy in East-Central Europe: The Last Decade as the Lost Decade in Democratization

2014· article· en· W915179398 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of comparative politics · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEuropean Politics and Security
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDemocratizationDemocracyPolitical sciencePoliticsCzechQuarter (Canadian coin)Index (typography)Development economicsPolitical economyGeographySociologyLawEconomics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The last decade of the EU membership has been a lost decade East-Central Europe many ways, first of all for the young generation, which has become a lost generation to a great extent, but also for the new twin paradigm of EU as the performance democracy and the sustainable social progress. The Ten Years' Anniversary of the EU membership gives a good occasion to analyse and evaluate the performance of ECE the EU. However, it does not give too much reason for the celebration, since it has been very controversial the terms of economic, social and political developments. This period has to be discussed the larger framework of systemic change (the Quarter-Century perspective), but with special regard to the EU membership period (the Ten Years perspective). This paper conceptually follows my recent paper (Agh 2014), dealing with the general framework on NMS developments both the Quarter-Century and Ten Years perspectives. This new paper concentrates, however, on the socio-political aspect of the Europeanization and Democratization East-Central Europe (V4+ as Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia and Croatia). The contributors to the Bertelsmann country reports (BTI, Bertelsmann Transformation Index and SGI, Sustainable Governance Indicators) have discussed the topic of ECE democratization with its general-regional and nation-specific features within the CEPSA (Central European Political Science Association) several times. Moreover, the big international ranking institutions like the Economist Intelligence Unit and the Freedom House (and many others) have also evaluated and documented these democratic developments. They have also concluded that the ECE democracy has been decline, especially the last years. Thus, this analysis of Europeanization and Democratization ECE can be based on the large documentation of these databases, and also on the cooperation of the ECE experts within the CEPSA and elsewhere.Key words: East-Central Europe; triple crisis; decline of democracy; good governance; global competitiveness.i Successes and failures of the ece countries the eu1.1 The European landscape and the forgotten the EastThe EU 2004, at the accession of the ECE countries, was rather different from the EU 2014, when they commemorate their Ten Years' membership. Therefore a short overview as an introduction is needed about both the new European landscape general and the forgotten the East particular, to be completed the last part of this paper with the larger overview of the present situation ECE. The EU has gone through several development stages that have necessitated its permanent redefinition. Under the pressure of global it has become common sense that the EU is or even some extreme views, its final crisis. Thus, the word has been so inflated that there is now a fashionable saying: crisis is just a period between two other crises. In fact, the EU has always been crisis, it comes from its sui generis nature of being always in the making, therefore the EU needs the analytical-descriptive and the normative-strategic approaches at the same time. There have recently been obviously three markedly different periods of crisis: (1) the immobility the nineties and early 2000s, (2) the global the late 2000s and early 2010s and (3) the the mid-2010s. In this respect, the crises are the natural ways of development for the EU, especially the present transformation which demands new solutions for both institutions and policies. Therefore, the EU needs visions for further development and these visions have to be formulated the concrete terms and programs of Strategies like the EU2020 Strategy.2In the transformation period the EU28 has become more than a MultiSpeed Europe, it is already a Multi-Floor Europe, since the different member states' positions have become institutionalized, i. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,666
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,308

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,345
Écart entre enseignants0,305 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle