A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Pregabalin in the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a chronic anxiety disorder that leads to significant functional impairment and reduced quality of life. Pregabalin is a novel analogue of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma amino butyric acid, which has been proposed as a treatment for a range of conditions including GAD. This study examined the efficacy of pregabalin for GAD across published trials, using a meta-analytic method. METHOD: This study examined the 7 published placebo-controlled trials of GAD using pregabalin, and, using meta-analytic techniques, we calculated the effect size of treatment with pregabalin (compared with placebo) on a total of 1352 people. RESULTS: The overall effect size of pregabalin in the treatment of GAD was Hedges' g = 0.364, with an effect size of 0.349 on psychic anxiety symptoms and of 0.239 on somatic anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSION: Pregabalin is an efficacious therapy for GAD, although effect sizes are smaller than those from earlier studies. Limitations and future research directions are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".