MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W918621235

Rebel Voices: An IWW Anthology

2014· article· en· W918621235 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnarchist studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCraftDeskillingTrade unionPower (physics)LawSociologyArt historyHistoryVisual artsPolitical scienceArtEngineeringEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Joyce L. Kornbluh (ed.), Rebel Voices: An IWW Anthology Oakland, CA: PM Press, Chicago: Charles H. Kerr; Pontypool: Merlin Press, 464pp; ISBN-13: 978-0850366-51-8.Rebel Voices has been consistently praised as the best single-volume history of the Industrial Workers of the World (I.W.W.) union since it was first published in 1964, and it is difficult to disagree with this assessment. The book examines the history of the I.W.W. from the union's founding convention up to the 1960s, as told by the members themselves through an excellent collection of their writings, songs, poetry and artwork. Kornbluh divides the volume into twelve thematic chapters. Included in this new (third) edition are Fred Thompson's 1987 introduction, a new preface by I.W.W. Starbucks union campaign co-founder Daniel Gross, and Franklin Rosemont's brilliant essay on Wobbly cartoons.Founded in Chicago in 1905, the I.W.W. set out to build a revolutionary model of labour organisation as an alternative to craft or trade unions. Machine production and the resultant 'deskilling' of the workforce, argued the union's founders, had rendered craft or trade forms of organisation outmoded and ineffective in fighting the increas- ingly concentrated power of capital. In place of the craft unions, the I.W.W. sought to organise workers on an industrial basis, meaning that all workers in the same industry were to belong to the same industrial union, without regard to the tools they used in production or their gender, ethnicity or skin colour. Revolutionary industrial unions were to be formed not only for the purpose of winning improvements in wages, hours, and working conditions, but also in the task of overthrowing capitalism and carrying on production without bosses. Direct action, rather than a reliance on paid officials or politicians, was the preferred tactic.Kornbluh focuses primarily on four occupational groupings: textile, lumber, mine and agricultural workers. Of note are chapters on the 1912 Lawrence 'Bread and Roses' textile strike and the 1913 Paterson strike - two of the most famous Wobbly industrial disputes. The fascinating chapter on the powerful I.W.W. Agricultural Workers' Organisation (A.W.O.) which numbered 70,000 members at its peak in 1917, shows the inner workings of one of the union's most successful initiatives. Agricultural workers in this period were regarded as 'unorganisable' by many in the labour movement given the highly mobile nature of their work. One innovation that facilitated the rapid organisation of harvest workers was the 'job delegate system', which consisted of a 'mobile set of organisers who worked on the jobs starting at the Mexican border in the early spring and winding up in late fall in the Canadian prov- inces' (p 230).The I.W.W. use of direct action tactics extended beyond the immediate point of production, as illustrated in a chapter devoted to the roughly thirty free speech campaigns that the union conducted between 1907 and 1916. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it