Lower Devonian stromatoporoids from the northern Obejo-Valsequillo-Puebla de la Reina Domain (Badajoz and Córdoba provinces, Southern Spain)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The stromatoporoid fauna from three locations in the “Peñón Cortado Limestone” (Pragian to Upper Emsian) from the area of Quintana de la Serena (Badajoz Province) and Peñarroya-Pueblonuevo (Córdoba Province) in the Obejo-Valsequillo-Puebla de la Reina Domain (Sierra Morena, Southern Spain) were investigated. The 71 stromatoporoid specimens collected belong to 11 different species. The “Peñón Cortado” section in the Córdoba Province contains two different stromatoporoid-bearing horizons with very different fauna (bed 14 and bed 19b). In the older bed 14 dominates Plectostroma salairicum (Javorskij, 1930), meanwhile in the younger bed 19b Actinostroma compactum Ripper, 1933 and Pseudotrupetostroma anacontentoae May, 2005b dominate. The fauna of the younger bed 19b of the location “Peñón Cortado” correlate well with the stromatoporoid-bearing beds of the locations “Guadámez II” and “La Chamorra” in the Badajoz Province. The absence of stromatoporoids with branched skeletons and the scarcity of stromatoporoids of the type which forms thin-layered crusts probably inhibited reef development. A possible explanation for this may be a relatively low water temperature. Biogeographically, the fauna of the Sierra Morena belong to the Old World Realm and is closely related to Emsian fauna of Australia and Canada. The fauna indicate an Emsian age for the stromatoporoid-bearing beds in the “Peñón Cortado Limestone”. Furthermore, the stromatoporoids from the locations “Guadámez II” and “La Chamorra” suggest an Upper Emsian age much more strongly than a Lower Emsian age.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".