Shift from fibrillar to nonfibrillar Aß deposits in the neocortex of subjects with Alzheimer disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A morphometric study of amyloid-beta-positive plaques in the neocortex of eight non-demented people from 68 to 82 years of age and 17 subjects with late-stage Alzheimer disease (GDS stage 7/FAST stages 7a-f) from 73 to 93 years of age shows a shift from prevalence of fibrillar plaques to prevalence of nonfibrillar plaques. In the aged, non-demented subjects, about 4/mm^2 plaques are detectable in the neocortex, and the majority are fibrillar plaques. Specifically, 64% found to be classical fibrillar and Thioflavin-S-positive bright primitive plaques. A lower percentage of pale primitive plaques (35%) relatively small proportion of plaques that are poor in thioflavin S-positive fibrils. The numerical density of plaques in the severe stage of AD increases to about 41/mm^2. Severely demented subjects appear to maintain an active process of fibrillar plaque formation. This is reflected in the presence of 3% bright primitive plaques. Severely demented subjects also manifest plaque degradation, reflected in the presence of 22% and 48% percentages of classical fibrillar plaques in non-demented subjects and in the end stage of disease suggest that once activated, the process of fibrillar plaque formation persists at a somewhat stable rate during the whole course of brain amyloidosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".