MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W92336766 · doi:10.1242/jcs.01031

Zena Werb

2004· article· en· W92336766 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fiona M. Watt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cell Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical and Biological Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceExtracellular matrixBiologyCell biologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zena Werb was born in Bergenbelsen, Germany to Polish Jewish parents. As a post-war refugee, with her family she moved from Wroclaw, Poland to Milan, Italy. From there they immigrated to Canada, first to Saskatchewan and then to southern Ontario, where Zena grew up on a farm. She went to the University of Toronto, where she read Honours Biochemistry, receiving a BSc in 1966. Studying with the late Professor Zanvil A. Cohn, Zena received her PhD in cell biology from The Rockefeller University, New York. Her post-doctoral work was at the Strangeways Research Laboratory in Cambridge, UK. After one year on the faculty of Dartmouth Medical School in Hanover, New Hampshire, she joined the University of California, San Francisco, as an Assistant Professor in the Laboratory of Radiobiology. She is currently Professor and Vice-Chair of Anatomy and a member of the Program in Biological Sciences and Biomedical Sciences Program at the University of California, San Francisco. Zena's research is on the roles of matrix metalloproteinases in normal and pathological tissues, concentrating on mouse models of bone and mammary gland development. She has demonstrated the importance of proteolysis as a mechanism of altering extracellular signaling. She has shown that remodeling of the extracellular matrix and the cellular microenvironment by stromal and inflammatory cells contributes to development of tumors as aberrant organs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cell ScienceSame topicMedical and Biological SciencesFrench-language works237,207