MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W928313289 · doi:10.54870/1551-3440.1354

Calculated Risks: The Teacher as Big Data Producer and Risk Analyst

2015· article· en· W928313289 on OpenAlexaff
Nat Banting

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Mathematics Enthusiast · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEducational Assessment and Improvement
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataContext (archaeology)Work (physics)Mathematics educationComputer sciencePsychologyData scienceEngineeringHistoryData miningArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Teachers’ work is often subjected to data analysis from outside sources in the forms of standardized examinations and media critique. This article uses the literature of risk analysis to play with two important analogies for teachers with regards to the emerging big data culture and the risk decisions therein. The complex context of the classroom facilitates the exploration of teacher as big data producer, while the multi-faceted nature of risk decisions provide the groundwork for the exploration of teacher as risk analyst. Illustrative classroom episodes portray examples of real and virtual risk faced by teachers, and a third category—curricular risk—is proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.416
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.040 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Mathematics EnthusiastSame topicEducational Assessment and ImprovementFrench-language works237,207