KIT Gene Mutations and Patterns of Protein Expression in Mucosal and Acral Melanoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently characterized KIT (CD117) gene mutations have revealed new pathways involved in melanoma pathogenesis. In particular, certain subtypes harbor mutations similar to those observed in gastrointestinal stromal tumors, which are sensitive to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize KIT gene mutations and patterns of protein expression in mucosal and acral melanoma. METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were retrieved from our archives. Histologic assessment included routine hematoxylin-eosin stains and immunohistochemical staining for KIT. Genomic DNA was used for polymerase chain reaction-based amplification of exons 11 and 13. RESULTS: We identified 59 acral and mucosal melanoma cases, of which 78% showed variable levels of KIT expression. Sequencing of exons 11 and 13 was completed on all cases, and 4 (6.8%) mutant cases were isolated. CONCLUSION: We successfully optimized conditions for the detection of KIT mutations and showed that 8.6% of mucosal and 4.2% of acral melanoma cases at our institution harbor KIT mutations; all mutant cases showed strong, diffuse KIT protein expression. Our case series represents the first Canadian study to characterize KIT gene mutations and patterns of protein expression in acral and mucosal melanoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".