MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W93073863 · doi:10.4000/peme.5395

Faire court : l’esthétique de la brièveté dans la littérature du Moyen Âge

2014· article· fr· W93073863 on OpenAlexaff
Corinne Denoyelle

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectives médiévales · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Poetry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce recueil rassemble seize communications du séminaire mensuel du CEMA en 2007 et 2008 autour de la thématique de la brièveté, appréhendée comme une esthétique. Alliant recherches théoriques et analyses d’ouvrages, jetant en particulier un nouveau regard sur les arts poétiques médio-latins, n’excluant pas pour une fois la littérature latine médiévale ou renaissante, cet ouvrage présente des études remarquables et témoigne de la pertinence de ce séminaire de recherche. Divisés en deux parties ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerspectives médiévalesSame topicFrench Literature and PoetryFrench-language works237,207