The justiciability of secession? : a theoretical foundation for constitutional association and disassociation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation addresses whether and to what extent constitutions, and their constitutional law more generally, make provision for secession. More broadly put, the question is what place secession has, or should have under municipal constitutional law. The two aspects of the question naturally are different in focus and intent. Whether secession has a place under any constitutional system depends very much on the text of any given constitutional document and the current body of constitutional law and norms. It is principally a factual enquiry, a matter for descriptive jurisprudence. Whether secession should figure in some way in a constitution or the constitutional law and norms is more speculative an enquiry, bordering on politics, legal theory, constitutional theory, and like matters, and pertains more to analytic jurisprudence. The two are nonetheless conjoined inasmuch as the subsuming of secession under a constitutional system in the absence of express provisions therefor depends in a large measure on what analytic stance we take on constitutional and legal theory, and on what a constitution, generally and in particular, should address. Now obviously, the two sides of this single issues are related, insofar as the first draws upon norms and principles to inform – implicitly – constitutional and relevant law, and the second upon the constitution and law as practical framework or instantiation of the norms and principles. This suggests that in constitutional theory, secession should be conceived less as purely some institutional re-arranging inside or outside the current institutional and regulatory framework. Similarly, a constitution should be conceived less as purely a template or map of state, and more as institutional architecture, namely the building of institutions to strengthen and develop the moral foundations of a society. We take the position in this thesis that secession is indeed a matter appropriate for constitutional law, and is governed thereby. Whilst secession provisions are not and should not be incorporated expressly into a constitution the process of secession is certainly subject to constitutional law and norms. Some inroad to a full grasp of this position (but not its implications) has already been forged by the Supreme Court of Canada, in the Québec Secession Reference. As such, and to the extent outlined below, secession, as an element of constitutional law, engages the courts at least on that basis, insofar as their jurisdiction permits. Accordingly, secession is more than a purely political (
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".