Long-range Coulomb interaction and Majorana fermions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report on our exact diagonalization studies of the effects of screened and unscreened long-range Coulomb interaction on the topological superconductivity (TS) phase in a quasi-one-dimensional semiconductor wire, proximity-coupled to an $s$-wave superconductor. We found that inclusion of the Coulomb interaction results in an enlargement of the region of parameter values where TS can be observed. This enlargement is proportional to the screening length of the Coulomb interaction. We also found that the interaction decreases the superconducting bulk gap. Some screening of the Coulomb interaction was found to be essential for observing TS in a quasi-one-dimensional semiconductor wire proximity-coupled to an $s$-wave superconductor. The theoretical framework employed here is quite general and can be used to address the issue of orbital effects and multichannel two-dimensional quantum wire for observation of TS in the presence of the Coulomb interaction between electrons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".