Enumeration of the bases of the bicircular matroid on a complete bipartite graph.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To evaluate the different excitability of Type 1 and Type 2 alpha-motoneurones, we analyzed comparatively the threshold and amplitude of the H-reflex and the Hmax/Mmax ratio in a slow muscle, soleus, and in a fast muscle, lateral gastrocnemius, of the rabbit. The H-reflex had almost always the same threshold in the muscles examined, but in soleus its amplitude increased much more than in lateral gastrocnemius when the stimulus intensity was increased. A clear difference in amplitude of the H-reflexes was already evident with stimuli subliminal for direct responses (M). The maximal H-reflex was always much higher in soleus than in lateral gastrocnemius. The calculation of the mean Hmax/Mmax ratio showed that it was 3 times higher in the slow than in the fast muscle. On the basis of these results, showing a clear-cut difference in the reflex excitability of slow and fast muscles and in the light of other experimental data available in the literature, we tend to conclude that Type 1 alpha-motoneurones are exclusively, or at least predominatly, depolarized by stimulation of afferent Ia fibres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".