A Fluid Play of Interchangeable Signs: Anna Jameson's Canadian Sketches, 1836-1837
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It was not unusual for travelers to Britain’s colonies to record their experiences and impressions in journals as well as in watercolor drawings in the nineteenth century. In fact, at this time there was an increasing demand for visual information about the new world, and visitors, settlers and explorers alike were encouraged to document their surroundings. This was a practice that was enthusiastically adopted by many amateur women artists visiting North America, including Anna Jameson (1794-1860), but artists such as Jameson were not always able to translate the firmly established European pictorial traditions to which they were accustomed to Canada’s landscapes. The disjuncture between Jameson’s knowledge, which was rooted in romantic ideology, and her stay in Canada is apparent in her drawings. This thesis investigates Anna Jameson’s visual representations in Canada and considers how she negotiated the often-contradictory frameworks of femininity and colonialism in her pencil and watercolor sketches of the landscape. The issue of freedom and its associations with travel is of particular importance as it had an undeniable effect on Jameson’s ability to define herself as she traveled through Canada’s wilderness, ostensibly – although not always – away from limitations related to her gender. Imagination, emotion, and knowledge also played important roles in the evolution of her selfhood, and consequently, in her representations of Canada’s landscape. Jameson’s attempts at self-definition and the emotional transformations that occurred over the course of her travels are reflected in her depictions of Canada’s wilderness – particularly in her water themed images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".