MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W9379215

Las limitaciones económicas de los artistas y su papel determinante en la pintura argentina (1900-1925)

2003· article· es· W9379215 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rodrigo Gutiérrez Viñuales

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos de arte de la Universidad de Granada · 2003
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Architecture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnthusiasmPaintingIndependence (probability theory)Quarter (Canadian coin)ArtHumanitiesWork (physics)Welfare economicsVisual artsEconomicsGeographyEngineeringPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this paper is to study an importan! aspect of artistic life in the Argentina of the first quarter of the 20'h century. We discuss the need for economic independence felt by local painters, whose work was deeply influenced by the fluctuations of the market. The enthusiasm of many collectors for European painting led to many local artists, working under difficult economic conditions, being frequently passed over.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuadernos de arte de la Universidad de GranadaSame topicHistorical Art and Architecture StudiesFrench-language works237,207