MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Determination of optimal in vitro conditions for camel alternative complement pathway assay

2001· article· en· W9385014 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V. Chopra, Sonu Kashyap

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Indian Journal of Animal Sciences · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Mental Health
KeywordsDiluentIonic strengthChemistryIncubationChromatographyAlternative complement pathwayEGTAIn vitroHeterologousSalineComplement systemBiochemistryCalciumNuclear chemistryBiologyImmunologyAqueous solution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optimal in vitro testing conditions for camel alternative complement pathway assay were determined. Effect of following variables were tested: heterologous erythrocytes, pH, ionic strength and Mg 2 + ion concentration of diluent, incubation time and temperature. The standard system of titrating the HC levels consisted of rabbit erythrocytes as target cells, veronal buffer saline with EGTA, pH 7.3, ionic strength 0.10 M, Mg 2 + concentration 4mM at 37°C temperature for 60 min incubation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Indian Journal of Animal SciencesSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207