Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desde un enfoque teorico influenciado por la obra de Gilles Deleuze, este articulo interroga el papel del afecto en la cultura politica contemporanea. Mediante un analisis de la dimension afectiva del terror, subraya las limitaciones de los procesos de “captura afectiva” que la teoria de la hegemonia considera fundamentales para el establecimiento del poder estatal. Pero en el mismo momento en que presenta el terror como un modo de organizacion que subvierte y cuestiona la logica trascendental de la hegemonia, tambien sugiere, contra Deleuze, que el afecto no puede servir de guia hacia una politica poshegemonica, ya que el mismo Estado tiende a volverse inmanente. La porosidad de la division entre trascendencia e inmanencia, entre razon y afecto, hace posible la constitucion doble del Estado, tanto en las instituciones como en el afecto. El articulo termina argumentando que es esta doble constitucion del Estado lo que la teoria de la poshegemonia tiene que analizar
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it