MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W9394027

Upper bounds on signed 2-independence number of graphs.

2003· article· en· W9394027 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArs Combinatoria · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGraph Labeling and Dimension Problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsIndependence numberIndependence (probability theory)CombinatoricsUpper and lower boundsDiscrete mathematicsGraphStatisticsMathematical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The metabolism of clozapine was studied in vitro using cDNA-expressed human cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes 1A2, 3A4, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 2E1. CYP1A2, 3A4, 2C9, 2C19, and 2D6 were able to N-demethylate clozapine. N-Oxide formation was exclusively catalyzed by CYP3A4. CYP2E1 did not metabolize clozapine. With regard to quantitative relationships, CYP1A2, 2C9, 2C19, and 2D6 displayed KM values ranging from 13 to 25 microM, whereas CYP3A4 had a 5-10 times higher KM value. CYP2C19 and 2D6 had the highest Vmax values (149-366 mol/hr/mol CYP). Taking into account the typical relative distribution of amounts of CYP enzymes in the liver, a simulation study suggested that at therapeutic concentrations CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 each accounted for about 35% of the metabolism. At toxic concentrations, the relative importance of CYP3A4 increased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it