“You Can’t Film Here”: Queer Political Fantasy and Thin Critique of Israeli Occupation in <i>the Bubble</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article défend l’idée que The Bubble, film qu’Eytan Fox a réalisé en 2006, fait une critique diluée et décevante de la société israélienne. La fascination, perceptible dans la production, pour la médiation cinématique, pour la politique de la représen - tation, et pour la politique-fiction apparaît glisser subrepticement dans des invocations racistes habituelles à une culture palestinienne arriérée, dans une forme néolibérale de discours sur la politique identitaire gay appuyée par des tropes sur la représentation et la visibilité et dans une approche du conflit Israélo-palestinien qui perpétue un cycle de violence. Cette analyse fait naître un questionnement à propos de certains enjeux contemporains relatifs aux films politiques et à la critique médiatique, particulièrement en ce qui concerne la façon de réagir à un cinéma qui anticipe la critique d’un discours politique qu’il prétend lui même critiquer mais dont il reste malgré tout complice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".