MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

STATISTICAL METHODS FOR PROCESS MONITORING AND CONTROL

2014· dissertation· en· W9397190 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jingyan Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Carcinogenesis · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsStatistical process controlProcess (computing)Computer scienceData scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, large-scale datasets are generated in industrial processes as varieties of digital instruments, analytical sensors and data devices are utilized. The data does not transfer to useful knowledge automatically. In the current age of big data, it is critically important to develop data-driven techniques to harness industrial data to make better decisions. Statistical methods can help to make sense of the variety of data from industrial processes. Specifically, this thesis addresses three applications of statistical methods in process engineering in order to obtain different kinds of process knowledge. With the high-dimensional and correlated process data, multivariate statistical process monitoring methods have been developed to extract useful information from a large amount of process data and detect various types of process faults. Specifically, an independent component analysis (ICA) mixture model based local dissimilarity method is developed for performance monitoring of multimode dynamic processes with non-Gaussian features in each operating mode. Then, two video analysis based pellet sizing methods are proposed for measuring the pellet size distributions without any off-line and intrusive tests. The videos of free-falling pellets are first taken and then the free-falling tracks of pellets in video frames are analyzed through the two video analysis based pellet sizing approaches. The utility of these two video analysis based pellet sizing methods is demonstrated through the online measurement and estimation of free-falling nickel pellets in two test videos. Moreover, a subspace projection based model-plant mismatch detection and isolation method is developed for the closed-loop MPC systems within state-space framework. The model quality indices are developed through subspace projection in order to eliminate the effects of system feedback. The paper machine headbox process with MIMO MPC controller is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in detecting and isolating different kinds of model-plant mismatches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.040
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.079
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0400.079
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0020.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0950.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular CarcinogenesisSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207