MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W94201970

Le Festival de TROIS fête son dixième anniversaire

2000· article· fr· W94201970 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Solange Lévesque

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit (Université de Montréal) · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Festival de TROIS fête son dixième anniversaire Histoire d'un succès que personne n'aurait attendu.A LA FIN DU MOIS D' AOÛT DE L' AN 2000, quand se terminera la dixième édition du Festival de TROIS, plus de 275 artistes auront défilé, en personne ou à travers leurs œuvres, sur les diverses scènes de la Maison des Arts de Laval, et quelque 13 600 spectateurs auront assisté aux spectacles présentés par le festival depuis son inauguration en 1989-À première vue, peu d'éléments jouaient en faveur de cet événement culturel.Onze ans après sa création, il est pourtant devenu un rendez-vous estival incontournable pour ceux qui aiment la httérature sous toutes ses formes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0940.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit (Université de Montréal)Same topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207