Bibliographic record
Abstract
花色素苷是影响花色的主要色素,二氢黄酮醇4-还原酶（DFR）基因是花色素苷合成的关键酶基因。本研究以云南地方彩色马铃薯品种‘剑川红’和‘转心乌’,外引品种‘黑美人’为实验材料,通过RT-PCR方法从其块茎表皮中克隆到DFR基因的完整cDNA序列,并进行了生物信息学分析。分析结果显示供试的三个彩色马铃薯的DFR基因编码381个氨基酸,具有完整的开放式阅读框（ORF）,DFR与NADPH的结合位点、底物特异性选择结合位点高度保守。同源比对表明,三个彩色马铃薯品种的核苷酸相似性为99.24%,氨基酸同源性为98.78%,与茄科的烟草、矮牵牛等的同源性均在86%以上。三个彩色马铃薯品种DFR都不具有信号肽,无明显跨膜区域,可能为亲水蛋白,定位于细胞质的可能性最高。α-螺旋和无规则卷曲是DFR的主要二级结构元件,DFR属于NADB-Rossmann superfamily。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".