MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Heart Failure Controversies

2014· book-chapter· en· W944587166 on OpenAlexaff
M. GABRIEL KHAN

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary cardiology · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeart failureMedicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The carefully run RCTs CHARM (2003), Val-HeFT (2001), and TRANSCEND (2008) did not show a decrease in total mortality in heart failure (HF) subjects (see Chaps. 4 and 12 ). This surprising finding was observed in patients intolerant to ACE inhibitor administration. It is abundantly clear that ARBs are not as effective as ACE inhibitor therapy for HF, hypertension, or stroke. The salutary effects of ARBs are probably less than that observed with digoxin, yet these agents are used widely and excessively. In Val-HeFT valsartan when combined with a beta-blocker caused significantly more cardiac events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContemporary cardiologySame topicHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207