Register of Marriages as a Source for Social and Economic History: Rovinj 1564-1633
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the period between the 15th and 18th centuries Rovinj experienced demographic growth and transformation unrivaled by any other Istrian town. According to contemporary records, the population has grown significantly from the last quarter of the 16th until the mid-17th century. The parish registers, preserved from the second half of the 16th century, allow us to reconstruct not only the historical demography indicators, but the social and economic status of the population, as well. The authors analyzed the oldest Rovinj marriage register. In addition to the usual data that such sources contain one also finds pieces of information regarding the social status of the newlyweds and the wedding gift ( basadego ) that the bridegroom or his family gave to the bride. Furthermore, the authors are able to determine the schedule of weddings by years and months. The observed changes in the analyzed period may indicate a change in the economic life of the town, as well as indicate an influx of new inhabitants. A comparative analysis of the seasonal distribution of weddings in Rovinj and other Istrian communities highlights the specific characteristics of Rovinj's wedding patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".