MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W947060145 · doi:10.1186/cc14654

Stakeholder engagement to identify priorities for improving the quality and value of care provided to critically ill patients

2015· article· en· W947060145 on OpenAlexaff
Henry T. Stelfox, Daniel J. Niven, Sean M. Bagshaw, Emily McKenzie, Melissa L. Potestio, Fiona Clement, David Zygun

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCritically illHealth careStakeholderQuality (philosophy)Value (mathematics)NursingStakeholder engagementMEDLINEEvidence-based medicineQuality managementMedical emergencyIntensive care medicineAlternative medicinePublic relationsBusinessComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Healthcare systems do not make optimal use of evidence, which results in suboptimal patient care. Large amounts of scientific evidence are generated but not implemented into patient care (knowledge to care gap). We sought to identify and prioritize knowledge to care gaps in critical care medicine as opportunities to improve quality and value in care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.132
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.141
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1320.141
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.014
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.537
GPT teacher head0.500
Teacher spread0.037 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical CareSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207